Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: "John Alberts" <john.m.alberts@...>
From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o>
Subject: Re: Foundation update
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:55:12 -0800
On 1/18/08, John Alberts <john.m.alberts@...> wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to elaborate so well on the status of everything.
>
>
> > That said, there has been a
> > lot of support for what drobbins has proposed
> > (http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html), which would make
> > the Foundation responsible for the health and direction of Gentoo as a
> > whole.  That's a discussion that's certainly worth having, and
> > gentoo-nfp@g.o is standing by....  Let's try not to take forever
> > having this discussion, so consider Monday, 23:59 UTC, to be a deadline
> > for your electronic voice to be heard.
>
> The only way the word will truly get out about this, is to put a
> notice on the front page with a link to this message.  Maybe someone
> who has access to the front page could post a little something on
> there about this?

Patience, a link is coming ;)

-Alec

>
> John Alberts
>
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 2:15 PM, Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote:
> > Here's an update.  It's the same as on my blog.
> >
> >
> > Current state of affairs
> > ------------------------
> >
> > With help from Renat Lumpau (rl03), I spent some time this week talking
> > to the Foundation's lawyers, collecting documents, and sifting through
> > old e-mails.  As I posted on gentoo-nfp a couple of days ago, the state
> > of New Mexico did, indeed, revoke the charter for the Gentoo Foundation,
> > Inc. in October of 2007.  It's still not entirely clear why, since I
> > mailed a check along with the (then) current and past-due annual reports
> > to the state of NM way back in July.  Since the check never cleared, it
> > seems a good guess that the paperwork went astray, but we won't know
> > until Renat's request (and $5) are processed by NM and they get back to
> > him.
> >
> > In any event, having the Foundation's charter revoked is exceptionally
> > embarrassing, but not catastrophic.  The state of NM has a
> > straightforward procedure for reinstating a revoked charter, as long as
> > the request to do so is filed within two years of the charter's
> > revocation.  This morning I sent by USPS Express Mail (tracking number
> > EO 943 358 815 US for those who want to play follow-the-paperwork from
> > home) an envelope to the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission,
> > Corporations Bureau containing an application for reinstatement, copies
> > of the missing annual reports, and a check for $60.
> >
> > Does the Foundation currently exist?
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > Many, many people have assumed, quite understandably, that with the
> > Foundation's charter having been revoked, that the Foundation has thus
> > ceased to exist.  That's not really true.  You can see this by looking
> > at the NM statutes, but it's simplest to see by looking at what happens
> > when NM receives the application for reinstatement.  The New Mexico
> > public regulation commission will determine if all of our paperwork is
> > in order.  If it isn't, they'll let us know what we need to do to
> > complete it.  Once it is, the commission will cancel the certificate of
> > revocation and file a certificate of reinstatement that takes effect "as
> > of the effective date of the administrative revocation and the
> > corporation resumes carrying on its business as if the administrative
> > revocation had never occurred".
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/2v6qtl
> >
> > Who is in charge here, anyway?
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Well, for the moment, I am.  Of course, since I'm one of the people who
> > let the Foundation's charter get revoked, that's probably not a good
> > thing, but that's what we have right at the moment.  Who am I?  I'm one
> > of the two Trustees who hasn't resigned.  (The other is pauldv.)  I'm
> > also one of the original Trustees from when the Foundation was
> > incorporated.  During that initial period I was made the Secretary of
> > the Foundation so that I could establish banking (which requires that
> > the Secretary sign the forms), and in 2005 I was chosen by the
> > then-newly-elected Trustees to be the President of the Foundation.  The
> > important part from the above is that I had the legal authority to sign
> > the application for reinstatement that I mailed earlier today.
> >
> > Could somebody else be in charge?
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> > Yes, but it would take some time.
> >
> > The Foundation has members.  Those members could set up an election,
> > vote out the current bums, and choose new, more dedicated folks to run
> > things.  Who are these members?  It's anybody who voted in a previous
> > Trustee election, and all current Gentoo devs who have been a developer
> > for one year at the closing of the election poll and actually vote in
> > the election.  The Gentoo Foundation has a _lot_ of members.
> >
> > An alternative is for the existing Trustees to appoint new trustees to
> > fill the gaps left by those Trustees who have left.  That would take
> > less time, but I'd feel much better doing that if new elections were
> > scheduled to occur within a reasonable amount of time.
> >
> > What happened to the SFLC?
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Weren't we going to consider joinging the Software Freedom Law Center's
> > Software Freedom Conservancy (http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/)?
> > Yes, and the SFC was, and still is, interested (as of just a few days
> > ago, anyway), although they have some concerns about managing the legal
> > aspects of an entire distribution.  (Gentoo would be larger, by far,
> > than any of their current member projects.) I still think that's the
> > right way to go, although it's ultimately going to depend on what the
> > Foundation's members want.  The bottleneck right now is the assembly of
> > documents that the SFC needs to go forward:
> >
> >   * Certificate of Incorporation (or analogous document for your org)
> >
> >   * Existing By-Laws for the Organization
> >
> >   * List of Directors (and historical list of previous directors, if
> >     available)
> >
> >   * List of Officers (and historical list of previous officers, if
> >     available)
> >
> >   * Minutes from all Board meetings for the last three years
> >
> >   * All Board Resolutions passed by the Directors
> >
> >   * Membership meeting minutes (if your organization is a membership
> >     organization)
> >
> >   * All Membership Resolutions (if your organization is a membership
> >     organization)
> >
> >   * All annual reports (published, or filed with any state or federal
> >     agency)
> >
> >   * All audited annual finanicals (if any were audited and/or filed)
> >
> >   * All financial reports of any kind for the last three years
> >
> >   * Copy of all state and/or federal filings (particularly including but
> >     not limited to tax-related filings) for the last three years.  In
> >     particular, be sure to include:
> >
> >       + the IRS determination letter for the status of your filing
> >
> >       + Your IRC Form 1023 filing
> >
> >   * List of any ongoing threats of litigation, or other disputes, and
> >     documentation of any resolved past litigation
> >
> >   * A list of all assets currently held by the organization (including
> >     backup documentation, such as copy of bank statements, etc.)
> >
> >       + Include a copy of *all* bank statements for the last year
> >
> >   * Any contracts that the organization has executed in the last three
> >     years (plus any older than that if they remain active)
> >
> >   * A list of any outstanding loans, leans, or other debts held by the
> >     Organization
> >
> > Much of this stuff needs to be assembled by me (because I have most of
> > the docs), and I got rather busy the last six months and didn't do any
> > of it.  I'm going to try to pull together as much as possible this
> > weekend, but I could use help on a couple of items.  Our sponsored ads
> > on www.gentoo.org presumably constitute contracts of some sort, so if we
> > have anything in writing I could use a copy.  Our major tangible assets
> > are the various gentoo boxes that we have, so a list of those would be
> > helpful.  I vaguely remember that once upon a time we fired a dev who
> > then threatened to sue us (but never did, fortunately).  Nonetheless,
> > we'd best include that info as well.  Help from devrel on that one,
> > please?  I'd like to have all of this stuff sent to the SFC on Monday,
> > if at all possible.
> >
> > Looking forward
> > ---------------
> >
> > So, what's next?
> >
> > We need new Trustees.  I don't think anybody will disagree there.
> >
> > We need to decide (again) what the role of the Foundation should be.
> > Currently, the Foundation exists to handle Gentoo's financial matters,
> > protect and defend Gentoo's trademarks and other intellectual property,
> > and provide ownership of various "hard" assets, such as the various
> > Gentoo server boxes.  The Foundation has almost no influence right now
> > over actual Gentoo (the OS) development.  The only caveat there is that
> > Gentoo needs to satisfy the requirements of a non-profit organization,
> > and it's the Foundation's job to let the Council know if something is
> > happening that might threaten the Foundation's non-profit status.  I
> > believe that this role is what the majority of the Foundation's members
> > actually want, and it's one that I believe would be even better served
> > by having the SFC handle it instead of us.  That said, there has been a
> > lot of support for what drobbins has proposed
> > (http://blog.funtoo.org/2008/01/here-my-offer.html), which would make
> > the Foundation responsible for the health and direction of Gentoo as a
> > whole.  That's a discussion that's certainly worth having, and
> > gentoo-nfp@g.o is standing by....  Let's try not to take forever
> > having this discussion, so consider Monday, 23:59 UTC, to be a deadline
> > for your electronic voice to be heard.
> >
> > What about drobbins' proposal?
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > I'd like to push off until Monday any actual decision, so that the above
> > discussion can happen first.  I don't think drobbins will mind the
> > delay, although he's not around right now for me to check first.
> > --
> > Grant Goodyear
> > Gentoo Developer
> > g2boojum@g.o
> > http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
> > GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
> >
> --
> gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list


References:
Foundation update
-- Grant Goodyear
Re: Foundation update
-- John Alberts
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Foundation update
Next by thread:
Re: Foundation update
Previous by date:
Re: Foundation update
Next by date:
Re: Foundation update


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.