Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: John Alberts <john.m.alberts@×××××.com>
To: gibbonsr-ml@××××××××××××××××××.com, gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] drobbins, leadership, etc.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:04:21
Message-Id: a23b6f900801161404m16cb988fqeb1d7df3865124d5@mail.gmail.com
1 You summed up my feeling exactly. No need for me to type anymore now. ;)
2
3 John Alberts
4
5
6
7 On Jan 16, 2008 4:04 PM, <gibbonsr-ml@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
8
9 > That WooHoo feeling seems to be held by most, Honestly at first i was
10 > there also.
11 >
12 > But now that I've calmed down, and started reading through everything I do
13 > not share the feeling. Do I think Daniel can help? Yes. Should we accept
14 > his current offer by Friday? No. Why? Many reasons, some having to do with
15 > the fact we just don't know enough. Another one is he is wanted
16 > unquestionable control ... which is dangerous to give to anybody, no matter
17 > how great the man once was. Would we give JFK or Lincoln complete control
18 > of the US, no checks, no balances .. no. (sorry to the non-us citizens for
19 > that example, best I could come up with in such sort notice).
20 >
21 > I know Daniel can help, but I also believe anybody who is committed enough
22 > can help. Somebody needs to take this personal, and take it as a part-time
23 > job and execute on actions, and be held accountable for what they did or
24 > didn't do.
25 >
26 > The past is the past, both good and bad. I think if Daniel would sit down
27 > with the Foundation, trustee, council and even allow others to join and
28 > listen (not speak, but listen) and then hash out a set of guidelines .. then
29 > great. But we shouldn't accept him blindly and unconditionally at this
30 > point in time. If Daniel doesn't want to sit down and talk this out, then
31 > he doesn't need to be back.
32 >
33 > ----- Original Message -----
34 > From: "John Alberts" <john.m.alberts@×××××.com>
35 > To: "Caleb Cushing" <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
36 > Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
37 > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:54:00 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
38 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] drobbins, leadership, etc.
39 >
40 > It might be prudent to back up your claims, conclusions, and suggestion
41 > with some type of fact. I'm not saying I disagree or agree with you, but
42 > basically, all you said was "WooHoo! Bring back Robbins!"
43 >
44 > John Alberts
45 >
46 >
47 > On Jan 16, 2008 3:43 PM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com> wrote:
48 >
49 > > just joining the conversation. I vote to bring drobbins back. Even
50 > > though i as
51 > > a user/admin and potential future developer, have no vote.
52 > >
53 > > I would also like to note that under the current leadership, of which I
54 > > have
55 > > no confidence, I have no desire to be a gentoo developer. were this
56 > > leadership to change and with some more improvement of my own skills I
57 > > would
58 > > consider it. I of course do not believe this decision is based on me,
59 > > and am
60 > > not attempting to inflate my own worth. but am merely pointing out that
61 > > I may
62 > > not be the only person who feels this way.
63 > > --
64 > > Caleb Cushing
65 > >
66 > > PGP keys available on key server
67 > > wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
68 > >
69 > > Due to low Internet availability I may not check
70 > > my email more than once a week, and thus cannot
71 > > guarantee a response time.
72 > >
73 >
74 >
75 >
76 > --
77 > Ryan Gibbons
78 > 817.657.1780
79 > gibbonsr@××××××××××××××××××.com
80 >