1 |
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:03 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 2008.08.13 01:31, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
6 |
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:43:34 -0400 |
7 |
> > "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 07:55 -0500, |
10 |
> > gibbonsr-ml@××××××××××××××××××.com |
11 |
> > > wrote: |
12 |
> > > > |
13 |
> > > > Another option, that might be fit our role more is some direct or |
14 |
> > online |
15 |
> > > > banking. ING.com is one of the biggest ones. Capital One is |
16 |
> > another one |
17 |
> > > > but I don't care for them as a company .. personal preference. |
18 |
> > That |
19 |
> > > > would get by the problem of having to be close by. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Looks like Capital One is a winner. We only have to provide them |
22 |
> > with |
23 |
> > > whom ever we want on file as authorized signers. We do not have to |
24 |
> > put |
25 |
> > > on file all officers. No one has to go to NM, or anything physical. |
26 |
> > > Because they offer direct bank accounts, accessed purely online. |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Now, that is great news. Thanks for all the effort you've put in on |
30 |
> > this. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> [snip] |
33 |
> > > -- |
34 |
> > > William L. Thomson Jr. |
35 |
> > > amd64/Java/Trustees |
36 |
> > > Gentoo Foundation |
37 |
> > > |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > Thanks again, |
40 |
> > Regards, |
41 |
> > Ferris |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > -- |
44 |
> > Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
45 |
> > Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees) |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> Team, |
48 |
> |
49 |
> I'm quite keen not to be a signatory since I'm not in the US. |
50 |
> Capital One (in the UK) already have my personal data as until |
51 |
> recently, I had an account with them. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Point to ponder ... |
54 |
> Should only trustees be signatories or should we permit officers to |
55 |
> operate the account too? |
56 |
> Trustees serve as officers today but that may not always be the case. |
57 |
> Indeed, it may be desireable to split the roles. |
58 |
> |
59 |
|
60 |
I firmly believe officers should be allowed signatories as well as |
61 |
trustees. So far as I know, that's how almost all corporations work. |
62 |
Day to day work is under the direction of the officers. (As an example, |
63 |
I looked at one bank --- Bank of America --- and initially they wanted |
64 |
to know about one of three officers (Pres, VP, Treasurer) and would have |
65 |
wanted a letter from the Secretary.) |
66 |
|
67 |
I have no idea what Capital One will want --- William does, though. |
68 |
|
69 |
> William, |
70 |
> Thanks for all the legwork. |
71 |
> |
72 |
> - -- |
73 |
> Regards, |
74 |
> |
75 |
> Roy Bamford |
76 |
> (NeddySeagoon) a member of |
77 |
> gentoo-ops |
78 |
> forum-mods |
79 |
> treecleaners |
80 |
> trustees |
81 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
82 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
83 |
> |
84 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAkijE9AACgkQTE4/y7nJvavqogCgvqwACzC8kvLj0aTd33EzJJjc |
85 |
> Y94An0bCVjlytaaPqdvrMs2RMlb9mw9G |
86 |
> =9n/V |
87 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
88 |
> |
89 |
> |
90 |
|
91 |
Regards, |
92 |
Ferris |
93 |
-- |
94 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
95 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |