Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Gentoo Foundation bank account
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:28:45
Message-Id: 1218648512.24858.53.camel@liasis.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Gentoo Foundation bank account by Roy Bamford
1 On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:03 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > On 2008.08.13 01:31, Ferris McCormick wrote:
6 > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:43:34 -0400
7 > > "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote:
8 > >
9 > > > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 07:55 -0500,
10 > > gibbonsr-ml@××××××××××××××××××.com
11 > > > wrote:
12 > > > >
13 > > > > Another option, that might be fit our role more is some direct or
14 > > online
15 > > > > banking. ING.com is one of the biggest ones. Capital One is
16 > > another one
17 > > > > but I don't care for them as a company .. personal preference.
18 > > That
19 > > > > would get by the problem of having to be close by.
20 > > >
21 > > > Looks like Capital One is a winner. We only have to provide them
22 > > with
23 > > > whom ever we want on file as authorized signers. We do not have to
24 > > put
25 > > > on file all officers. No one has to go to NM, or anything physical.
26 > > > Because they offer direct bank accounts, accessed purely online.
27 > > >
28 > >
29 > > Now, that is great news. Thanks for all the effort you've put in on
30 > > this.
31 > >
32 > [snip]
33 > > > --
34 > > > William L. Thomson Jr.
35 > > > amd64/Java/Trustees
36 > > > Gentoo Foundation
37 > > >
38 > >
39 > > Thanks again,
40 > > Regards,
41 > > Ferris
42 > >
43 > > --
44 > > Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
45 > > Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
46 > >
47 > Team,
48 >
49 > I'm quite keen not to be a signatory since I'm not in the US.
50 > Capital One (in the UK) already have my personal data as until
51 > recently, I had an account with them.
52 >
53 > Point to ponder ...
54 > Should only trustees be signatories or should we permit officers to
55 > operate the account too?
56 > Trustees serve as officers today but that may not always be the case.
57 > Indeed, it may be desireable to split the roles.
58 >
59
60 I firmly believe officers should be allowed signatories as well as
61 trustees. So far as I know, that's how almost all corporations work.
62 Day to day work is under the direction of the officers. (As an example,
63 I looked at one bank --- Bank of America --- and initially they wanted
64 to know about one of three officers (Pres, VP, Treasurer) and would have
65 wanted a letter from the Secretary.)
66
67 I have no idea what Capital One will want --- William does, though.
68
69 > William,
70 > Thanks for all the legwork.
71 >
72 > - --
73 > Regards,
74 >
75 > Roy Bamford
76 > (NeddySeagoon) a member of
77 > gentoo-ops
78 > forum-mods
79 > treecleaners
80 > trustees
81 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
82 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
83 >
84 > iEYEARECAAYFAkijE9AACgkQTE4/y7nJvavqogCgvqwACzC8kvLj0aTd33EzJJjc
85 > Y94An0bCVjlytaaPqdvrMs2RMlb9mw9G
86 > =9n/V
87 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
88 >
89 >
90
91 Regards,
92 Ferris
93 --
94 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
95 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Gentoo Foundation bank account "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>