Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "Constantine D. Kardaris" <ckardaris@×××××.com>
To: Nikola Zivkovic <theshadowgate@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Some suggestions:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:32:24
Message-Id: 5e16d6f70801161632h42fd96a8hff6f8f9b2b9f5a7a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Some suggestions: by Nikola Zivkovic
1 On Jan 18, 2008 3:42 AM, Nikola Zivkovic <theshadowgate@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > 1. Accept Daniel's offer.
3 > 2. Use paludis as default PM.
4 > 3. Gentoo overlays/sunrise/bugzilla. Where is development supposed to be
5 > focused? We have a main tree and several other areas where development may
6 > be! I don't care if you need to switch revision control system, but there
7 > needs to be some simplification on the development process.
8 > 4. Proper multi-repository support for Gentoo.
9 > 5. More transparency of dev process.
10 > 6. Less time-consuming way of becoming a developer.
11 > 7. A distributed software tree: not a single main tree like portage-tree. But
12 > more like git or bazaar (as far as I know paludis supports multi-repository
13 > dependencies.)
14 >
15 > I could think of many more but I think that this is sufficient enough.
16 > All the best and good luck!
17 > --
18 > gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list
19 >
20 >
21
22 Well 1. automatically blocks 2. and vice versa (at least in this life) =D
23 --
24 gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list