List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 13:20 +0200, Spider wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 12:29 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:33:42PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > > 1. Members must be currently active Gentoo developers who have been
> > > developers for at least a year.
> > > 2. Members must have requested membership. If you don't want to be
> > > a member of the foundation, you shouldn't have to be. (Indeed, the
> > > actual role of the foundation is quite limited.)
> > I agree with this proposal, with the addendum that membership should be
> > rerequested each year. It gives more work but keeps the membership list
> > clean over the years with people interested in the bureaucracy of dealing
> > with IP, funding requests and dealing with Social Contract complaints.
> Can you make it every two years? One year isn't long enough to fall
> beyond the "active in the last year" limit, two is.
I think two years is to long.
We have had a board of 13 for almost a year now
and as you can see there in the short period of time that has passed
already that many have already become inactive. By changing to a two
year setup we could potentially shoot ourselves in the foots by having a
board that can grow stale. The members that have done a good job and
it's visible to our devs however will be renominated and reelected.
With that said, I think cshields has done pretty good job the past year
looking out for our Gentoo interests and I'd like to see him right back
in there for another term.
Ned Ludd <email@example.com>
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list