1.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2008.05.30 19:09, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Apologies for flaking out Sunday.  I was not well at all; better now.
> 
[snip]
> So
> let's make that a single topic meeting and approve what we have and
> move on.  Only thing we have to make sure of is that amending the
> bylaws is relatively easy.
[snip]
> 
> Regards,
> Ferris
> - -- 
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkhAQvAACgkQQa6M3+I///cg5QCgqoyEthYL1CBwtuhAUMFHTk5K
> KvwAn2rXIDjynDFllBYXkgx9RhgHyfkC
> =ECg9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
Ferris,

I'm not clear on the intent of this.

1. You want us to go back to where we started and approve what we 
inherited ?

2. You want us to use Articles 1-3 as we reviewed them and 4 onwards 
from the draft ?

I'm not keen on either. 1 means we throw away what we have done on the 
bylaws. 2 means doing further work so we make sure the hybrid is self 
consistent.

As we have to review the bylaws anyway, what about leaving contentious 
bits until the end, then maybe only carrying out editorial changes to 
make them consistent with with everything else.
By definition, its non-controversial and allows us to build rapidly on 
what we have already done.   


- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhEelQACgkQTE4/y7nJvavfwQCfYdfw3W+Q15hqco5jEDePr6sn
ruYAoL9d5EoyCrfTRaPLfvJ/jIkPC2PH
=Ynf6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list