Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 20:23:33
Message-Id: 1211487785.23677.198.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes by Luca Barbato
1 On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 21:30 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 10:36 -0700, Chrissy Fullam wrote:
4 > >> How would Gentoo benefit from having non-developers (individuals as you put
5 > >> it) and businesses (you don't mention sponsors so I presume any business,
6 > >> say Intel) be allowed to become part of the foundation and have a vote?
7 > >
8 > > By allowing the greater community to feel they are participating and
9 > > have a role in Gentoo. Not limiting the Gentoo community to just
10 > > developers.
11 >
12 > Why not?
13 >
14 > > Unless you or others feel we should ignore the community.
15 >
16 > Which community?
17
18 Just to be more specific and clear wrt to community. I as a developer,
19 not a Trustee. I get all kinds of help from the Gentoo community.
20 Patches, bug fixes, pointing out mistakes/errors, providing
21 improvements. It's invaluable, and at times more help than I get from
22 fellow Gentoo developers. Which I have a couple open bugs, I can't get
23 any devs to help me with. The recent ones I needed help on that are
24 closed, the community/users/contributors came through on.
25
26 For some reason it seems like what happens with adults forgetting they
27 were kids. Developers seem to forget we were once users. We might one
28 day return to being users. So should those that do not wield developer
29 status not matter?
30
31 Some of our longest contributing members to Gentoo Java, aren't devs,
32 nor will they ever be. They don't want to be. Some even have their own
33 overlays. So guess they should not have any say or input.
34
35 There should not be this elitism with a divide between developers,
36 users, contributors, sponsors, etc. We are all together the Gentoo
37 community. Which the foundation as I understand it, was intended from
38 it's inception to represent.
39
40 But the foundation has never been operated or run as intended. Or really
41 at all beyond 2005 it appears. Basic duties weren't getting done, much
42 less anything beyond that.
43
44 --
45 William L. Thomson Jr.
46 amd64/Java/Trustees
47 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>