| 1 |
Not sure that I got it 100% right from his blog post, but seems that |
| 2 |
this is exactly what Daniel would not want. On his place I wouldn't |
| 3 |
agree. He will have have more responsibility as "once creator of the |
| 4 |
project" yet the same authority. but this is just IMHO, of course. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Jan 19, 2008 7:56 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 19:36 +0000, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 8 |
> > I understand that some people might oppose this, and Daniel Robbins |
| 9 |
> > might not even accept such an offer, but I want to throw out this idea |
| 10 |
> > for discussion: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > How about we appoint Daniel Robbins as a "standard" Foundation trustee |
| 13 |
> > right now? (or in whatever timeframe is sensible - 1-2 weeks?) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> +1 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > Any thoughts? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Not a bad idea at all. Gives him ability to take action without full |
| 20 |
> control initially. If his actions and efforts are worth while, should be |
| 21 |
> an easy sell to all on presidency. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 25 |
> Gentoo/amd64/Java |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@×××××.com> |
| 32 |
Jabber: svyatogor@×××××.com |
| 33 |
ICQ: 158439855 |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives