| 1 |
On Monday 27 September 2004 02:45, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/26/04 Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Thoughts? Discussion? Anyone still subscribed to this list? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Thanks, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How does the following paragraph apply to developer-owned domains, or |
| 8 |
> more general, when is something "officially part of the Gentoo |
| 9 |
> project"? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > The name "Gentoo", when used in the spirit of the definition provided |
| 12 |
> > by the Gentoo Social Contract, is not allowed: |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > * within domain names unless the domain is officially part of the |
| 15 |
> > Gentoo project |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Well, this is the default license. Of course we don't need to license |
| 18 |
gentoo itself ;-). It however in principle does hold for developers |
| 19 |
(unless in assignment from gentoo). If you want an exception you can |
| 20 |
apply for it with reasons. The idea for the document is to have most |
| 21 |
people know what they can expect, and as a guideline for the foundation. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Paul |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 27 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 28 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 29 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives