| 1 |
Renat Lumpau wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 1/16/08, James Laslavic <squarebottle@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Renat Lumpau wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 1/16/08, James Laslavic <squarebottle@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Also note that technically, Daniel Robbins already owns all the |
| 6 |
>>>> trademarks and stuff again because when the charter was revoked, all |
| 7 |
>>>> contracts and stuff (such as the transfer of rights) was legally |
| 8 |
>>>> nullified. He's pretty much just being polite by asking. |
| 9 |
>>> This is entirely false. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> I'm not a lawyer, but that is my understanding of how it works. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Enough said. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Please start using actual debate to make rebuttals, or at the very |
| 17 |
least, upload a scanned copy of _your_ license to practice law in the |
| 18 |
state of New Mexico. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
All of my points still stand. =) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sincerely, |
| 25 |
Square Bottle |
| 26 |
www.visualflavor.org |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives