1 |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:58 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 23:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
4 |
>> > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
>> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:02 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
6 |
>> >> > Its good to have a empty seat filled. But if the person filling it can't |
7 |
>> >> > get the tasks at hand done. There is not much difference to the seat |
8 |
>> >> > being empty. :) |
9 |
>> >> |
10 |
>> >> there is when the legal requirements are that we have X trustees |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > There is no such law or any legal requirement. A company can be a single |
13 |
>> > person which includes a Corporation in any form, C, S, etc ;) |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> the law says the bylaws must be followed. our bylaws say we need X |
16 |
>> people. ergo we are legally required to seat X people. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> What law says that? Bylaws are for internal operations. We made the |
19 |
> bylaws, and there is no entity that will ever enforce breaching bylaws. |
20 |
|
21 |
sorry, i didnt mean bylaws, but rather the charter, or whatever |
22 |
document that describes the non-profit. it used to say we needed 7 |
23 |
trustees, but it has since been changed to 5. |
24 |
-mike |