-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Corey Shields wrote:
| Sure.  But we're doing this with volunteers, some of which we can't seem
| to get to speak up as it is, I'd hate to imagine the added task of
| tracking varying membership levels..   :P

Don't mean any personal disrespect, but you're joking, right?  We're an
organisation of over 300 developers, and between us we can't automate a
membership management system?  C'mon, that's the sort of thing they give
to kids at school aged 15 as schoolwork.

| It could remain an option for the future.  But as Grant already pointed
| out, it was in the first proposed set of bylaws and was highly criticized.

Sorry, I haven't seen Grant's email saying that (unless it was in an
older thread).

| Sorry, figuring out who could apply for membership is a prerequisite to
| opening up for membership applications.   :)

~From the lack of response to this thread, I guess most Gentoo devs
really don't care.  Maybe we should have mandatory voting?  If you don't
vote, you can't be a dev.

Best regards,
Stu
- --
Stuart Herbert                                         stuart@g.o
Gentoo Developer                          http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/
~                                              http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCWuVIDC+AuvmvxXwRAoakAJ44clh+8LDQp3vhHkunycEJTNi8egCgqS7u
9vTck1+/UYmaOn+I14UWjFo=
=kjP1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list