Renat Lumpau wrote:
> On 1/16/08, James Laslavic <squarebottle@...> wrote:
>> Also note that technically, Daniel Robbins already owns all the
>> trademarks and stuff again because when the charter was revoked, all
>> contracts and stuff (such as the transfer of rights) was legally
>> nullified. He's pretty much just being polite by asking.
> 
> This is entirely false.
> 

The Gentoo charter was revoked, so in the eyes of New Mexico, it does 
not exist as a legal entity anymore, and thus does not have the 
privileges that go with it. Unless the Foundation specifically passed 
the rights on to some other legally recognized entity before it ceased 
to exist, then the transfer of rights being nullified would return the 
rights to Daniel. I'm not a lawyer, but that is my understanding of how 
it works. If you can find some laws that say that this is wrong, then 
super duper.

At any rate, all of the points I have made still stand. ;)
-- 
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list