| 1 |
Renat Lumpau wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 1/16/08, James Laslavic <squarebottle@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Also note that technically, Daniel Robbins already owns all the |
| 4 |
>> trademarks and stuff again because when the charter was revoked, all |
| 5 |
>> contracts and stuff (such as the transfer of rights) was legally |
| 6 |
>> nullified. He's pretty much just being polite by asking. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This is entirely false. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The Gentoo charter was revoked, so in the eyes of New Mexico, it does |
| 12 |
not exist as a legal entity anymore, and thus does not have the |
| 13 |
privileges that go with it. Unless the Foundation specifically passed |
| 14 |
the rights on to some other legally recognized entity before it ceased |
| 15 |
to exist, then the transfer of rights being nullified would return the |
| 16 |
rights to Daniel. I'm not a lawyer, but that is my understanding of how |
| 17 |
it works. If you can find some laws that say that this is wrong, then |
| 18 |
super duper. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
At any rate, all of the points I have made still stand. ;) |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives