| 1 |
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 19:43, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm, for one, unclear on how it's deceptive. And how is he being a |
| 4 |
> lawyer about it? To me, it looks like he brought up a good point: we |
| 5 |
> don't officially *have* by-laws yet -- we can't until they're ratified |
| 6 |
> by vote. I don't know that evil intent should be ascribed to Joshua's |
| 7 |
> email, but that's just me. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Could any of the trustees verify this with the lawyers. They probably can |
| 10 |
answer the question very easilly. And could the trustees then actually make |
| 11 |
bylaws and accept them if the "current" ones are not valid yet. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Paul |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 19 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives