-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
| On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:44 -0700, Chrissy Fullam wrote:
|>> as I'm not the only
|> one discussing this it must be viewed as worth other people's time.
|
| Who else is participating? Alec was responding to your questioning with
| reasoning. Rich came from left field. Blackace is commenting on my
| response. So who else is discussing this?
|
| Not a single person has made a single post on the recently voted in
| bylaws other than Chrissy. There are other much more questionable
| subjects and sections in the bylaws. But those are being ignored.
|

William, while I failed to join the discussion in the last 2 meetings
and haven't been able to check what was approved, I'm also interested in
this point. So Chrissy is not alone in this.
I also note that for the few months I followed the discussion on the nfp
list about the bylaws, I only remember a mention to this around the
council election time and I wasn't aware that it had in fact been enacted.
My personal opinion is that making this a rule is wrong and can prove to
be counter-productive. I understand the reasons you and others have
raised, but in my view this should be left to the voters - it is (or
should be) their choice in the end.

- --
Regards,

Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / SPARC / KDE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki9VnwACgkQcAWygvVEyAL35QCghupWld9s51bR1QeYgvO5oKOU
NP0AoIhVT84oSORrcwvFqEep20bA2hFx
=rNR9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----