1 |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 09:24:37AM -0600 or thereabouts, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
> If the NFP survives, it would still have ownership of the trademarks. |
3 |
> There's no way for me to take them from the NFP, so no need for the NFP to |
4 |
> take them back. The NFP could simply resume using them if (theoretically) it |
5 |
> shut down for a period of time but then resumed its mission. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The other reasoning for allowing me to use the marks is one of fairness. I |
8 |
> developed the "Gentoo" brand and committed myself to giving this brand |
9 |
> value. I personally designed the "G" logo (in blender; it was a lot of |
10 |
> work.) They could legitimately be sold to the NFP rather than just |
11 |
> transferred. This is what my lawyer suggested I do, because from his |
12 |
> perspective it is common sense. I again talked him down for just the ability |
13 |
> to continue to use them and thus keep running the Store as a separate entity |
14 |
> for as long as I choose. |
15 |
|
16 |
I think this is very fair and reasonable thing. My only suggestion/request |
17 |
would be to make this a non-transferrable license. I certainly don't |
18 |
begrudge you making some money off of Gentoo in light of your |
19 |
contributions. However, I think if you ever decided (for whatever reason) |
20 |
to sub-license and/or sell your license to another entity, that could |
21 |
potentially lead to a lot of problems and might not be in the best |
22 |
interests of Gentoo. |
23 |
|
24 |
--kurt |