Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Point behind foundation members existence
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:42:21
Message-Id: 1213152134.5380.118.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Point behind foundation members existence by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 So no takers huh? No one wants to comment on why the Foundation has
2 members in the first place?
3
4 For all the comments on changing the foundation's membership. One would
5 think people would have more input or comments. On what being a Gentoo
6 Foundation member even entails. Or the purpose for the Gentoo Foundation
7 to even have members.
8
9 Seems the rules could just be changed to say, active dev, on for 1yr,
10 etc. You can vote, just like for council. Since it seems all Foundation
11 membership gives one, is the ability to vote on Foundation matters.
12 Which is basically just elections.
13
14 --
15 William L. Thomson Jr.
16 amd64/Java/Trustees
17 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Point behind foundation members existence Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>