Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Senno During <senno.during@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] drobbins, leadership, etc.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:44:36
Message-Id: 8d4615a30801161444i48d39dbcx15d6a9478e7cb9a2@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] drobbins, leadership, etc. by Sergey Kuleshov
1 this is my feeling too. So far drobbins has given an option. i have
2 heard good things about it, and bad things about it. Though, no
3 alternative is known to me. i hope to hear about one soon!
4
5 i also believe there will always be devs/users (are pretty important
6 too i think!) that are not going to be happy with the choice that is
7 going to be made.
8
9 i do feel that Gentoo, currently, needs a sort of dictator, like Linux
10 with Torvalds. Of course, you always hope for the right choice and right
11 ideas from the leader then. But no decisions being made by a group, just to
12 prevent a dictator style, doesn't sound right to me either.
13
14 Senno During
15
16 On Jan 16, 2008 11:09 PM, Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@×××××.com> wrote:
17 > I'd second almost everything Caleb said. I do feel, that Daniel should
18 > come back. And if he does I'll try to come back to the developers
19 > (which I left some time ago). not that I think this will make any
20 > difference, but just wanted to express my opinion as well.
21 >
22 > and when I hear peoples' concerns about handing him control of Gentoo,
23 > I have only one question in return - any better options? cause what we
24 > have now proved to be quite a failure.
25 >
26 >
27 > On Jan 16, 2008 10:07 PM, <gibbonsr-ml@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
28 > > That WooHoo feeling seems to be held by most, Honestly at first i was there
29 > > also.
30 > >
31 > > But now that I've calmed down, and started reading through everything I do
32 > > not share the feeling. Do I think Daniel can help? Yes. Should we accept
33 > > his current offer by Friday? No. Why? Many reasons, some having to do with
34 > > the fact we just don't know enough. Another one is he is wanted
35 > > unquestionable control ... which is dangerous to give to anybody, no matter
36 > > how great the man once was. Would we give JFK or Lincoln complete control
37 > > of the US, no checks, no balances .. no. (sorry to the non-us citizens for
38 > > that example, best I could come up with in such sort notice).
39 > >
40 > > I know Daniel can help, but I also believe anybody who is committed enough
41 > > can help. Somebody needs to take this personal, and take it as a part-time
42 > > job and execute on actions, and be held accountable for what they did or
43 > > didn't do.
44 > >
45 > > The past is the past, both good and bad. I think if Daniel would sit down
46 > > with the Foundation, trustee, council and even allow others to join and
47 > > listen (not speak, but listen) and then hash out a set of guidelines .. then
48 > > great. But we shouldn't accept him blindly and unconditionally at this
49 > > point in time. If Daniel doesn't want to sit down and talk this out, then
50 > > he doesn't need to be back.
51 > >
52 > >
53 > >
54 > > ----- Original Message -----
55 > > From: "John Alberts" <john.m.alberts@×××××.com>
56 > > To: "Caleb Cushing" <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
57 > > Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
58 > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:54:00 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
59 > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] drobbins, leadership, etc.
60 > >
61 > > It might be prudent to back up your claims, conclusions, and suggestion with
62 > > some type of fact. I'm not saying I disagree or agree with you, but
63 > > basically, all you said was "WooHoo! Bring back Robbins!"
64 > >
65 > > John Alberts
66 > >
67 > >
68 > > On Jan 16, 2008 3:43 PM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com> wrote:
69 > > > just joining the conversation. I vote to bring drobbins back. Even though
70 > > i as
71 > > > a user/admin and potential future developer, have no vote.
72 > > >
73 > > > I would also like to note that under the current leadership, of which I
74 > > have
75 > > > no confidence, I have no desire to be a gentoo developer. were this
76 > > > leadership to change and with some more improvement of my own skills I
77 > > would
78 > > > consider it. I of course do not believe this decision is based on me, and
79 > > am
80 > > > not attempting to inflate my own worth. but am merely pointing out that I
81 > > may
82 > > > not be the only person who feels this way.
83 > > > --
84 > > > Caleb Cushing
85 > > >
86 > > > PGP keys available on key server
87 > > > wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
88 > > >
89 > > > Due to low Internet availability I may not check
90 > > > my email more than once a week, and thus cannot
91 > > > guarantee a response time.
92 > > >
93 > >
94 > >
95 > >
96 > > --
97 > > Ryan Gibbons
98 > > 817.657.1780
99 > > gibbonsr@××××××××××××××××××.com
100 > >
101 >
102 >
103 >
104 > --
105 > Sergey Kuleshov <svyatogor@×××××.com>
106 > Jabber: svyatogor@×××××.com
107 > ICQ: 158439855
108 > --
109 > gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list
110 >
111 >
112 --
113 gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list