Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-nfp@g.o
From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
Subject: Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:15:35 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Team,

1. We are required to advise Foundation members of meetings, in advance 
and it seems, written notice is required. Its my view that an opt in 
mailing list like gentoo-nfp is not adequate. Many members don't 
subscribe and its also used for public debate, which many members are 
not interested in.
I don't think snail mail is in keeping with our image either.

It follows that we need something like gentoo-foundation-announce which 
members are automaticly subscribed to or we use a list of members email 
addresses to circulate notices. The difference is one of implementation 
detail.

We probably need to agree our bylaws before we can implement such a 
list, as the bylaws define the qualifications for membership.

2. IRC voting and Proxies.
I'm not sure we will ever use IRC for a vote. It could be managed by 
voicing the members on the list in 1) and setting the channel +m. Votes 
are then cast, since only members can speak in the channel.

The voicing will also prove that voting nicks are identified.

If we allow proxies, it gets more complex. We need to voice the proxies 
and when we count votes, ensure that the member and proxy cast only a 
single vote.

Its further complicated by a world wide membership. The law says that 
to be quorate and make decisions a members meeting needs >10% of the 
members entitled to vote on an issue (at the first attempt anyway). A 
short voting period on IRC would exclude the half our members who 
would be in bed. In reality, we would struggle to make the 10%.  There 
were less than 40 attendees for our first meeting, when interest in the 
Foundation was at its height.

I'm coming round to the opinion that any issues needing to be put to a 
vote of members will be voted on in the normal Gentoo way over a period 
of days, if not weeks. If that's so, we need some officers to run 
votes.

I'm just trying to air my views in advance of the Sunday meeting in the 
hope it will make the meeting slicker. 

Thoughts and other options please. 

- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgHk84ACgkQTE4/y7nJvaslpACeIPl+nPMN6PR17/+x8cTgJZK7
BKUAoM50PAhkuK4SfPZawk71K1R9Styb
=Uhcf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Re: Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
-- Ferris McCormick
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-nfp: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Draft Foundation By Laws
Next by thread:
Re: Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
Previous by date:
Re: Draft Foundation By Laws
Next by date:
Re: Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-nfp mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.