List Archive: gentoo-nfp
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Crap, wrong From address.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alec Warner <antarus@...>
Date: Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes
To: "William L. Thomson Jr." <email@example.com>
Cc: gentoo-nfp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 20:17 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>> No way? How negative :P. I think this is a noble goal (even if only
>> to pay a fraction).
> See list archive between say September and October. Very low volume
> then. My ideas not even matured were raped to pieces.
I will say I was a bit rash in that conversation. Note that claiming
you want to pay folks when
you presently have no money sounds silly (and it still kind of does).
Claiming you want to help the foundation make money because sometime
in the nebulous future you want
to be a more independent project is a bit more...well presented arguement?
I don't recall you mentioning for instance, FreeBSD's success in asset
management and distribution; certainly it
helps make your point a bit clearer no?
>> I would, however, choose not to throw away certain principles of how I
>> think Gentoo should be ran to
>> achieve this end and I sometimes feel that William's ideas would do so
>> (e.g. selling advertising space).
> We are selling ad space now. Just indirectly and with no consistent
> policies. Plus some like GNi get questionable benefit.
You may interpret it as selling; I do not. It is a 'you scratched our
back and we will scratch yours' kind of deal.
> But Gentoo having ads is selling out just as much as Google is by making
> billions of ads in the first place :) Which Gentoo turns around and uses
> for Summer of Code and etc.
> I love the double standard, and all the ideals do what exactly for
They give me warm fuzzies?
Google loses millions of dollars a year by leaving the "I'm feeling
lucky!" search button on their front page by virtue of users never
seeing advertisements for queries served by that button. Why doesn't
Google remove it and recoup all that money? What does the button do
I imagine a bunch of engineers would get pissed if it was removed
because it is a fun item and shows that Google is a fun company.
I imagine if you sold space on the web page a bunch of 'community
members' would get pissed because Gentoo doesn't do stuff like sell
advertising to anyone because it is a project run by volunteers who
don't want corporate overlords.
> William L. Thomson Jr.
> Gentoo Foundation
email@example.com mailing list