| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:08:06PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I think that's about it for the moment. We have 13 trustees, so it's |
| 4 |
> > entirely possible that people are working on things that I don't know |
| 5 |
> > about. We should really fix that. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I've been trying to contact a few (dozen) sites that are violating the |
| 8 |
> guidelines set forth on the Gentoo g logo usage; not much reply on it |
| 9 |
> though. Luckily some of them do reply positively. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Many sites consider the g-logo a community logo and feel that they are free |
| 12 |
> to use it any way they like, including offering t-shirts and such that |
| 13 |
> "look" official but have no link whatsoever with the Gentoo Foundation. |
| 14 |
Potentially a dumb question, but any reason we don't have offenders |
| 15 |
listed on the website? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Shame them, essentially. This is assuming they care, and people see |
| 18 |
the pigs list, but it at least makes people aware that people are |
| 19 |
dinking us over. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Aware this is also affected by any legal wrangling involved, just an |
| 22 |
idle suggestion. |
| 23 |
~harring |
Archives