Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Requirements for places of incorporation.
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:18:50
Message-Id: 44A97BA0.2050709@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Requirements for places of incorporation. by Joshua Jackson
1 Joshua Jackson wrote:
2
3 > We don't have many developers around the DC, whereas we have a ton
4 > around Oregon, California, Colorado and so on. So if there had to be a
5 > quick trip to where the foundations home is, it'd be far easier in
6 > Nevada then it would be in DC, which is across the country for most of
7 > the developers. Its also about a hour flight from all of the above
8 > except colorado.
9 >
10 > Finally we have a couple of developers in nevada, at least both have
11 > what could be considered fairly permanent residence as well to act as
12 > the "resident agent". So its just some things that were brought up
13 > that are worth taking into account. I'll still look at dc though
14
15 I think keeping it as anonymous as we can make it is best. I don't like
16 the idea of counting on a developer to always be in a particular area.
17 Its just a lot easier to manage from my point of view.
18
19 --
20 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
21 Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
22
23 ---
24 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
25 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
26
27 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature