1 |
On 17 Apr 2004, at 02:51, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> I'm sorry that you view my past decisions to put Gentoo above |
4 |
>> the needs of my family as "whining." |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Typo, this was not written correctly. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> s/my past decisions/mentioning the factual result of my past decisions/ |
9 |
|
10 |
Those were not my words, and it certainly wasn't intended that way. |
11 |
With 'whining' I was referring to the fact that you were using 'huge |
12 |
personal debt' as an excuse for 'unconditional' commercial usage of |
13 |
trademarks etc. |
14 |
With unconditional I meant that there were no guarantees that your FP |
15 |
entity contributes back to gentoo, and you had already excluded means |
16 |
of the NFP enforcing contributing back to gentoo (royalties). |
17 |
If you would make extremely huge profits, we couldn't ask for a part if |
18 |
you reinvested all the money in your FP entity again. |
19 |
|
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
|
22 |
Pieter Van den Abeele |
23 |
|
24 |
> Daniel |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> gentoo-managers@g.o mailing list |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |