1 |
Corey Shields wrote: [Wed Sep 21 2005, 11:13:16AM CDT] |
2 |
> In my mind, PR should be second |
3 |
> on our priority list next to infra.. but that might be just me. :) |
4 |
|
5 |
I'll agree with that statement. I deliberately shot low for pr just |
6 |
because I didn't know what we were actually spending. |
7 |
|
8 |
> The question then is where does the PR budget land? I would like to |
9 |
> see the Foundation handle most of the PR and promotion of Gentoo, |
10 |
> since it just seems easier to keep it close to the source. Again, |
11 |
> this is just a personal idea/opinion. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'm not opposed, but presumbably we should check w/ the existing PR team |
14 |
to see if they have an opinion. Anybody know who's in charge of PR |
15 |
these days, if anybody? |
16 |
|
17 |
> As for infra, $1.5k is good for covering operations and incidentals, but |
18 |
> should not be expected to include any servers that need to be purchased |
19 |
> (because it obviously isn't enough). Such items should be proposed |
20 |
> seperately for now. But the $1.5k should be enough of a buffer to cover |
21 |
> things like disk failures and to get Lance a leash^H^H^H pager. |
22 |
|
23 |
Yeah, I was really proposing a budget for replacement parts, not |
24 |
replacement machines. I figured those would go through the usual |
25 |
funds-request process. |
26 |
|
27 |
> So if we went $1.5k for PR and $1.5k for Infra, making $3k for the year, we |
28 |
> should be just fine financially. We are averaging $4k a quarter with the |
29 |
> prospect of another $1.5k/quarter revenue just around the corner. |
30 |
|
31 |
I assume that there's been some falloff since we started collecting |
32 |
funds. Does the monthly/quarterly income seem to have stabilized? |
33 |
|
34 |
-g2boojum- |
35 |
-- |
36 |
Grant Goodyear |
37 |
Gentoo Developer |
38 |
g2boojum@g.o |
39 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
40 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |