On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:07 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 14:37 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > > Being as it's already January 27th:
> > 
> > Yes, it wasn't expected days would go by with no response. So picking
> > any new dates is kinda pointless till we know when they will be
> > commented on.
> > 
> > > Nominations start Jan 30th through Feb 12th,
> > > Elections Feb 13th through 27th, new Trustees in march ;)
> > 
> > No problem, unless we don't hear from Grant by the 30th. Then we reset
> > again and push back/delay some more.
> 
> Umm... how about "from now until the 12th" so we can just start and not
> wait for Grant.
> 
> No offense, but this whole "we have to wait for $foo to comment" is why
> we're very much in this boat in the first place.  Do any of you
> seriously think that Grant is going to have some sort of objection to
> the *dates* in which the election is held?

Thank you. I brought that up many times in IRC in #gentoo-dev. But got
no where :( So posted and waited. But voiced again today I wasn't happy
about it. I don't care what dates, just so we get moving ;)

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/amd64/Java