Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Foundation roles and Daniel's track record
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:41:01
Message-Id: 20080125083946.d303a515.genone@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Foundation roles and Daniel's track record by Daniel Drake
1 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:48:09 +0000
2 Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > If any other developers from that "era" would like to weigh in and
5 > clarify/correct/disagree with any of the below, feel free - I know that
6 > there are others around who have more of a picture than I do.
7
8 [...]
9
10 > A common complaint was that Daniel kept starting projects and making
11 > movements and then not following through. I witnessed this first hand
12 > where after admitting a huge backlog of issues that only he could work
13 > on, he went on to propose that Gentoo Technologies spin off another
14 > company, a co-operative to provide services around Gentoo or something
15 > like that.
16
17 Another, probably clearer example is portage-NG, which never left the
18 vaporware stage and IMHO caused some complications wrt portage
19 development in 2003/2004 as many things were slated to be "something
20 for portage-NG" by Daniel, therefore not implemented back then and
21 harder to implement when we finally realized that portage-NG would
22 never exist (though we probably should have known better when we heard
23 the plans which were quite ... interesting).
24
25 Marius
26 --
27 gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list