On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:43 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: [Tue Jan 29 2008, 02:40:14PM CST]
> > Um, didn't you re-nominate me with others earlier? :)
> 
> You're not a nominee because you haven't accepted the nomination.

Just did it for the formality/technicality. If it's not clear that I
accept it without having to state it, based on past posting and efforts
so far. Maybe I shouldn't accept ;) BS stuff like this makes me kinda
want to decline.

If we repeat the nomination process again for what ever reason and I am
re-nominated. I accept in advance ;) Can we move on already instead of
stupid things like this :)

Had the process been started a bit more officially and properly in the
first place, we wouldn't be re-nominating and re-accepting.

> That said, I'm declining the nomination on my behalf.  I'll be available
> to help, but I can do that without being a Trustee.

That's to bad, but likely time wise is justified much less having
already served a term. As long as you are around to help and advise when
need be. Should be fine :)

Ideally any past trustees, like the previous board. Would remain around
and available as advisers to the existing board members if needed.

-- 
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/amd64/Java