1 |
Nick Dimiduk wrote: |
2 |
> Funny. I circumvented econf because it wouldn't build on Panther. |
3 |
> ./configure worked just fine. |
4 |
|
5 |
yeah, but using ./configure you don't set all the paths and |
6 |
environmental stuff portage does. Especially the --prefix option is |
7 |
vital amongst others. |
8 |
|
9 |
> I don't have a Panther machine to test this on, though I will give it |
10 |
> some time this afternoon. |
11 |
|
12 |
I did a preliminary test on Panther to see if the configure would work, |
13 |
and that worked fine. |
14 |
|
15 |
> I would like to point out that we have the potential for all the same |
16 |
> kinds of issues as a merged x86/amd46 team would have, regarding binary |
17 |
> incompatibility and keywording. Not the the extent of that team, but |
18 |
> difficulties none the less. |
19 |
|
20 |
I agree, but this problem should to a certain extend be solved by using |
21 |
portage provided versions of programs yet supplied by the OS. I |
22 |
personally think that for now we can get away with primarily looking at |
23 |
OSX Tiger. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Fabian Groffen |
27 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |