Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Kito <kito@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST}
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:27:57
Message-Id: 96EC9334-9887-4302-A8C7-291492CDBDC6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST} by Grobian
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Grobian wrote:

> On 22-03-2006 11:03:09 -0600, Kito wrote: >> On Mar 22, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Grobian wrote: >>> What about using ${EPREFIX} instead of ${PREFIX}? ${PREFIX} at >>> least > >> Yeap, I was thinking about this too. It should be done. Maybe we >> can tackle >> both of these this weekend. > > You should at least tackle both at once, IMO ;)
FINE! I'll start checking in the portage changes to svn. That being said, in case any of you are in the habit of running the svn version, it'll be broken for a bit.
> I can help with changing ebuilds/eclasses, as I'm currently in a fight > with binutils, gcc and glibc anyway.
Ok, why don't you keep all your changes local and we'll try to coordinate a big atomic commit this weekend perhaps? --Kito -- gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Freeze of the prefixed portage tree Grobian <grobian@g.o>