Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: m h <sesquile@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install.
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:50:54
Message-Id: e36b84ee0603211150k4bd1c11fi3cdce9d13f7d63c5@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install. by Kito
On 3/21/06, Kito <kito@g.o> wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Grobian wrote: > > > On 21-03-2006 11:05:22 -0800, m h wrote: > >> Has anyone else ran into this? I'm not setting this flag and don't > >> see it in the ebuilds.... > > > > Yep sure I do! > > > > I believe it had to do with my install of GCC. There was a problem > > somewhere, but I don't recall anymore what. Let me do a quick google. > > > > You say you emerged GCC, are you sure it is using it? The stack > > protector stuff needs a patch, and I think it's in the Gentoo one. I > > think now I now again what the problem is. > > > > You emerged Gentoo gcc, but you're not using it, because: > > to use a Gentoo compiler, you need eselect-gcc or something. And for > > that to emerge, you need a lot of packages, including the compiler. > > Looking at your emerge info, it looks like DEFAULT_PATH has other > stuff before the prefixed paths. This will of course have the host os > gcc found before the portage version(s). Figure out where the > additional path entries are getting prepended and it might work. >
Thanks for the response Kito. I don't actually have gentoo gcc installed (yet, it's going as I type). I prepended the PATH stuff after exg mentioned that in IRC yesterday. I'll move it back to the end of DEFAULT_PATH. Thanks for the hint. -matt -- gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Verbose info regarding 2.1.11 Linux install. m h <sesquile@×××××.com>