Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Hasan Khalil <gongloo@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Cc: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Current status
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:24:11
Message-Id: 76DEDA47-F983-4E23-972D-778468E171C4@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] Current status by Finn Thain
1 On Jul 31, 2005, at 11:54, Finn Thain wrote:
2
3 >
4 >
5 > On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Philipp Riegger wrote:
6 >
7 >
8 >>
9 >> On 31. Jul 2005, at 9:29 Uhr, Finn Thain wrote:
10 >>
11 >>
12 >>> Hasan, you mentioned pathspec and prefixed installs, and future
13 >>> portage features to accomodate these. Is there more information
14 >>> available anywhere on the portage roadmap and the particular future
15 >>> portage features you are referring to?
16 >>>
17 >>
18 >> this is exactly what i wanted to know, thank you for asking the
19 >> question
20 >> i could not express. :-)
21 >>
22 >
23 > After googling for quite some time, I did find the answers: no,
24 > there is
25 > nothing relevant on the portage roadmap document [1], but the missing
26 > portage features have been discussed on the dev list.
27 >
28 > There's at least one bugzilla entry [2] that refers to the relevant
29 > portage features apparently under development.
30 >
31 > The relevant comments in that bug apparently come from the
32 > discussion of
33 > Michael Haubenwallner's draft GLEP [3], which is designed to
34 > provide for
35 > prefixed package installs on non-Gentoo O/S's. The thread is worth
36 > a read,
37 > if you can tolerate the obligatory naysaying and bickering. It is
38 > inconclusive, but represents real progress.
39 >
40 > As for pathspec, there is nothing to be found. Even drobbins original,
41 > rather inspired, description is long gone [4]. By contrast, Michael
42 > Haubenwallner's proposal for prefixed installs appears to be alive and
43 > kicking.
44 >
45 > Finally, there is this post [5] from Feburary, indicating that the
46 > problem
47 > is to be tackled by the Gentoo/OS X devs this year.
48 >
49 > -f
50 >
51 > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/
52 > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87877
53 > [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27569
54 > [4] http://web.archive.org/web/20040407083519/www.gentoo.org/proj/
55 > en/gentoo-alt/macos-1.xml#doc_chap2_sect4
56 > [5] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/25299
57
58 Whoa. Looks like you covered pretty much everything I'd have to say
59 on the topic. Good job! 10,000 brownie points for Finn.
60
61 Basically, Brian Harring (ferringb) is deeply involved in rewriting
62 much of the portage internals. Once the rewrite is complete, we can
63 expect things like ICANINSTALLTO (from [1] above) to be implemented
64 very easily.
65
66 Brian needs help. If you're willing to help, contact him, or join
67 #gentoo-portage on freenode.
68
69 --
70
71 Hasan Khalil
72 eBuild and Porting Co-Lead
73 Gentoo for Mac OS X

Attachments

File name MIME type
PGP.sig application/pgp-signature