1 |
On Sun, August 21, 2005 18:56, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Aug 21, 2005, at 07:11, Grobian wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I would propose to require the latest and greatest for both |
6 |
>> supported platforms |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Done. Thanks for pointing this out. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
Another thing that crossed my mind when going to work this morning: |
12 |
|
13 |
When people submit bugs for working/new packages, they usually tell it |
14 |
works fine, or in some cases that they applied a little patch to get it |
15 |
working. However, before even thinking of keywording, I want to know |
16 |
whether the package reasonably works. That means, I want to do some small |
17 |
sanity check, or just functional check that the application or library |
18 |
appears to work as expected. I think you cannot expect any dev to know |
19 |
every package in portage, let alone being common with using it. So I'd |
20 |
propose to add a little note on the "reporting bugs" section that asks the |
21 |
users to -- if they can come up with it: |
22 |
1) in case of an application tell us how you can test it works: example, |
23 |
streamripper, do streamripper http://some.host.com/music path/to/bla.mp3, |
24 |
listen to the mp3, it appears to work fine |
25 |
2) in case of a library tell us what application can be used to test it, |
26 |
preferable small and direct: example, libpcre, emerge mp with USE flag |
27 |
pcre, start mp on a file, press Ctrl-a navigate in the menu to search, |
28 |
type a regular expression search like .(build|merge|keyword)+, check it |
29 |
matches an appropriate string |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |