| 1 |
On Aug 7, 2005, at 07:41, Grobian wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Folks, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I got repoman telling me I didn't have any Java installed on my OSX |
| 6 |
> system. I took a look into the macos/virtuals file and macos/10.4/ |
| 7 |
> package.provided file and figured there seems to be an inconsistency. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> package provided says: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> while virtuals says: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> To 'fix' this issue, I altered virtuals like this: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> --- default-darwin/macos/virtuals 6 Aug 2005 22:43:40 |
| 20 |
> -0000 1.7 |
| 21 |
> +++ default-darwin/macos/virtuals 7 Aug 2005 12:35:48 -0000 |
| 22 |
> @@ -12,5 +12,6 @@ |
| 23 |
> virtual/xft x11-base/apple-xfree |
| 24 |
> virtual/opengl x11-base/apple-xfree |
| 25 |
> virtual/blackbox x11-wm/fluxbox |
| 26 |
> -virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk |
| 27 |
> +virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk |
| 28 |
> virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> note that the virual/jre seems to be fine and in line with |
| 31 |
> package.provided. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> are there any objections to this change? should it be the other |
| 34 |
> way around (the edit in package.provided)? ... or can I just check |
| 35 |
> it in? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Kito and I discussed this yesterday, and he committed the fix about |
| 38 |
15 hours ago, or somewhere thereabouts. From what I can see in CVS, |
| 39 |
the problem is fixed. He essentially did what you did, but in an |
| 40 |
effect of what he felt is more correct. Since I'm no expert on how |
| 41 |
the java herd divides up the packages, I left him to do his thing. To |
| 42 |
save you the trouble, here's the important stuff: |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> macos $ grep -R java . |
| 45 |
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 |
| 46 |
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08 |
| 47 |
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08 |
| 48 |
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 |
| 49 |
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08 |
| 50 |
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08 |
| 51 |
> ./virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk |
| 52 |
> ./virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin |
| 53 |
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 |
| 54 |
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5 |
| 55 |
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04 |
| 56 |
> ./progressive/virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
It's a good thing that you posted this, though. It provides a good |
| 59 |
follow-up, and opens the floor for discussion on said changes. So, |
| 60 |
people -- discuss, if you so desire! As always, we, the Gentoo for |
| 61 |
Mac OS X team, are open to comments, suggestions, free food, and |
| 62 |
patches. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-- |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Hasan Khalil |
| 67 |
eBuild and Porting Co-Lead |
| 68 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X |
Archives