1 |
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 14:49 -0800, m h wrote: |
2 |
> I'm basically at the same state with Haubi's toolsbox and your method. |
3 |
> After chatting with Kito I'm also thinking about sticking with |
4 |
> toolsbox. (Since it is pretty generic and should run on most any |
5 |
> unix). Kito also helped explain the next steps with seem to be coming |
6 |
> up with virtuals/package.provided for (taken from emerge info): |
7 |
> dev-lang/python: [Not Present] |
8 |
> sys-apps/sandbox: [Not Present] |
9 |
> sys-devel/autoconf: [Not Present] |
10 |
> sys-devel/automake: [Not Present] |
11 |
> sys-devel/binutils: [Not Present] |
12 |
> sys-devel/libtool: [Not Present] |
13 |
> sys-devel/odcctools: [Not Present] |
14 |
> virtual/os-headers: [Not Present] |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Haubi- How did you deal with this in your 2.1 tree? |
17 |
|
18 |
Hmm, don't know what you did, but i've installed these things using |
19 |
portage. IIRC portage reads those versions from its database, not |
20 |
querying the package's executables found in PATH or the like. |
21 |
|
22 |
My 'emerge --info' output is attached. |
23 |
|
24 |
~haubi |