| 1 |
On 10/31/05, Kito <kito@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Should be usable in both cases. Literally, the prefix stable patch is |
| 8 |
> > chunks of my 2.1 work and haubi's work torn out and integrated into |
| 9 |
> > 2.0 |
| 10 |
> > for prototype demonstration. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Those last 2 words should be stressed... don't want anyone getting |
| 13 |
> false ideas of whats being done here... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well, if this is "round two" (which seems kind of weird since it's |
| 16 |
backported from v2.1 to 2.0...). I'm interested in tracking the |
| 17 |
"official" version as closely as possible. Maybe I should test this |
| 18 |
version out on FC4. What will "round three", etc, look like (are |
| 19 |
there missing features, is it just testing, getting ebuilds converted, |
| 20 |
evangelism)? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Kito- Could you please elaborate on the bootstrap process? Perhaps |
| 23 |
we could put it in the wiki? Regarding changes to ebuilds, yes I |
| 24 |
agree small (or no) changes is preferred. I went ahead and installed |
| 25 |
apache2 in my prefixed environment and it was relatively |
| 26 |
straightforward. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Brian- Do you have any idea of the roadmap for prefix getting into |
| 29 |
portage? Would it possibly get into 2.0? 2.1? Rewrite? What will |
| 30 |
determine this? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
matt |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives