Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-osx
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-osx@g.o
From: "m h" <sesquile@...>
Subject: Re: some portage-prefix patches
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:43:55 -0600
Cool to see some activity on the list!

Does anyone have a diff from prefix to the portage code it was based
on?  I'm interested in seeing how big the patch is.  Also since normal
portage appears to have some activity it might be nice to try to keep
in sync with it.

On 7/25/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote:
> On 25-07-2006 15:04:47 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after some time using portage-prefix-2.1.14 with some patches now, its
> > time for me to post these (partially) very useful patches...
> >
> > Hopefully they will make it at least to the list at once...
>
> Wow.  Thanks Michael!
>
> Time is not my best friend at the moment, but I hope these patches can
> give a new "impulse" to the prefix portage development!
> --
> gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list


References:
some portage-prefix patches
-- Michael Haubenwallner
Re: some portage-prefix patches
-- Grobian
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: some portage-prefix patches
Next by thread:
Re: some portage-prefix patches
Previous by date:
Re: some portage-prefix patches
Next by date:
[PREFIX] Portage eating variables?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-osx mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.