List Archive: gentoo-osx
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Stroller wrote:
> Sorry to come to this so late - I'm just back from holiday.
> On Aug 8, 2005, at 6:38 am, Kito wrote:
> > Maybe you misunderstood, what I think is futile is trying to avoid
> > overwriting files, and accommodating things portage has no knowledge of or
> > control over.
> Unless you avoid over-writing Mac OS's system files Gentoo-OSX will
> never become mainstream.
You should take the context into consideration when trying to understand
Kito's comment, which was in reply to my post about Gentoo/Darwin. In that
light, he is absolutely right, collision-protect is counter-productive.
In the context of Gentoo/OS X, I think everyone agrees that prefixed
installs would be preferable to collision-protect.
If you install Gentoo/OS X, you will find collision-protect is used by the
default profile. You concerns seem to be aimed at the progressive profile
that some users prefer. It is your choice.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list