| 1 |
On Thursday 10 November 2005 18:19, Grobian wrote: |
| 2 |
> I agree with you, but I don't follow your reasoning. Portage IMHO |
| 3 |
> expects it's own (GNU) find and xargs. Or well, not Portage, but devs |
| 4 |
> that just create ebuilds on Gentoo Linux and don't mind about your bugs |
| 5 |
> for sticking to a common subset of supported flags. |
| 6 |
No, people got already stabbed for using GNU find options in ebuilds, as they |
| 7 |
are not portable and IIRC this was already clear a lot of time ago. |
| 8 |
And for the rest, give me the ones who don't care about my bugs, and I'll see |
| 9 |
with their herd/project/whatever will be. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> The alias sed |
| 12 |
> -> gsed is only used in Portage itself, it's *not* set in the global |
| 13 |
> profile for the user. |
| 14 |
Right |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Which is nice. Why don't we (OSX) use this ebuild? (If it indeed does |
| 17 |
> what I think it does.) |
| 18 |
Because it's not in main tree? Remember when I said you should start looking |
| 19 |
at the gentoo-alt overlay? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Then this rather innocent email I started this thread with, turns out to |
| 22 |
> be a the cause of a valuable conclusion, that you and I need to do some |
| 23 |
> work on this subject. |
| 24 |
Right. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 28 |
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives