| 1 |
On 06-09-2006 15:37:31 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> this is one reason why i never stopped using my toolsbox to bootstrap |
| 5 |
> portage: it creates environment-scripts, besides others containing those |
| 6 |
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH bits. And well, this is called SHLIB_PATH on HP-UX and |
| 7 |
> LIBPATH on AIX. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
With respect, but I think the reason we don't use toolbox is because I |
| 10 |
never got it to bootstrap anything :( |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> And for the running portage, i've some patches to let portage |
| 13 |
> dynamically extend the list of extendable variables with values |
| 14 |
> from /etc/env.d/ files. |
| 15 |
> In combination with some baselayout-packages, which do those |
| 16 |
> configuration through /etc/env.d/, i'm able to inform portage to dupe |
| 17 |
> the value of LDPATH into LD_LIBRARY_PATH, SHLIB_PATH or LIBPATH, |
| 18 |
> depending on the profile, which unmask the correct baselayout for a |
| 19 |
> specific platform. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ahh... I knew the problem was bigger than it looked :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Patches/ebuilds coming soon ... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Much appreciated |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives