On Aug 15, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Hasan Khalil wrote:

> For a while now, we've been thinking that iniviting a few of of our  
> leading bug-solvers to be ppc-macos arch testers would be great for  
> efficienty and all that jazz. What do you guys and girls think  
> about bringing some AT's on board (we want both official devs' and  
> non-offical-devs' opinions here). This would allow us developers to  
> tackle porting packages that don't work on ppc-macos out of the  
> box, and still get through the maze of "package foo works on ppc- 
> macos" bugs. This would also be a great way to quickly address some  
> of the QA problems Fabian mentioned in his recent post about a  
> testing system, as well as a good way to get to know some promising- 
> looking dev candidates.

Sounds like a good idea.

>
> On that note, we were both happy to see Fabian's proposal hit the  
> mailing list, as well as the openness with which it was greeted.  
> Please keep all of us on this ML posted with the catalyst on ppc- 
> macos port progress.

Good to see Mom and Dad happy :p

Relevant progress reports will probably remain on that thread I would  
assume.

>
> In terms of the elections for Gentoo for Mac OS X project leads  
> that we discussed in previous threads, since there have been no  
> other nominations, are there any objections to us taking the  
> positions and getting to work on the points we mentioned in our  
> candidacy e-mail? Please let us know one way or another.  
> Alternatively, if anyone wants to throw in a last-minute candidacy  
> pitch, please do so now! If no one objects or announces candidacy  
> within a week, we'll make an announcement on -dev and change the  
> project page as necessary.

Sounds like you guys are going to do this regardless, so why wait a  
week?

>
> --
>
> Hasan Khalil && Lina Pezzella
> eBuild and Porting Co-Leads
> Gentoo for Mac OS X
>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list