Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-osx
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-osx@g.o
From: "P. A. A." <adijedi@...>
Subject: also ddd Re: Current status
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:13:29 -0500
also, I should not that using the keywords "ppc-macos ~ppc-macos ppc" , 
the wonderful tool 'ddd' installed flawlessly :)

Cheerd,
Patrick


On Jul 31, 2005, at 2:29 AM, Finn Thain wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Kito wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2005, at 8:12 PM, Hasan Khalil wrote:
>>
>>> As of yet, portage is not suited for what we have now termed 
>>> 'pathspec', or
>>> 'installing to an alternate prefix', or 'using portage as a 
>>> secondary package
>>> manager', etc. Changes are being made to portage that will allow for 
>>> features
>>> like this, and should be included in the next major release (some 
>>> months away
>>> still).
>>>
>>
> [snip]
>
>> The main problem as I see it, is you have a live tree of some
>> ~10,000 linux based packages, with a userbase of >100,000 LINUX 
>> users, a
>> dev team of >350 linux developers...how on earth do you convince these
>> linux users and devs that a massively huge project like supporting
>> arbitrary install prefixes is worth the trouble, especially when it
>> would mostly benefit a sideproject with 3 devs and probably only 
>> slighty
>> more users?
>
> Remember that for some of us, it doesn't matter if no more than a tiny
> fraction of ebuilds work. One should not confuse Gentoo (i.e. the 
> portage
> tree) with Portage itself. Non-Gentoo developers, distros and O/S's can
> benefit from a portable portage, even if it comes with an empty portage
> tree. By "portable portage", I mean that it would support new ebuilds 
> that
> will play nicely on arbitrary host.
>
> But the question remains, how to bring the existing ebuilds along for 
> the
> ride? Kito is right that most linux devs aren't going to care too much.
> Most of them are not in a position to test their ebuilds on half a 
> dozen
> different platforms. But then, they don't all test on half a dozen
> different linux architectures anyway.
>
> Hasan, you mentioned pathspec and prefixed installs, and future portage
> features to accomodate these. Is there more information available 
> anywhere
> on the portage roadmap and the particular future portage features you 
> are
> referring to?
>
> -f
> -- 
> gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: also ddd Re: Current status
-- P. A. A.
References:
Current status
-- Philipp Riegger
Re: Current status
-- Hasan Khalil
Re: Current status
-- Philipp Riegger
Re: Current status
-- Hasan Khalil
Re: Current status
-- Kito
Re: Current status
-- Finn Thain
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Current status
Next by thread:
Re: also ddd Re: Current status
Previous by date:
Re: Current status
Next by date:
Re: also ddd Re: Current status


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-osx mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.