Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-osx
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-osx@g.o
From: Hasan Khalil <gongloo@g.o>
Subject: Re: Current status
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 00:05:56 -0500
On Jul 30, 2005, at 23:34, Kito wrote:

> Just to be a semantic pain in the ass, / is an apple provided  
> file... If you are worried about keeping a pristine OS X  
> environment (read: still qualify as a 'supported configuration' for  
> tech support, etc.) then installing portage on OS X in any of its  
> current forms is not what you should be playing with. Portage  
> installs files in /usr, /etc, /System and whereever else ebuild  
> maintainers feel like putting stuff, , basically everywhere a 3rd  
> party software vendor should never touch. A simple software update  
> could kill your portage packages/config files...

I'll match your semantic-pain-in-the-ass and raise you a super-silly- 
remark. '/' is not a file; it's a directory. :P

Seriously, though, I wouldn't say that installing/using Gentoo for  
Mac OS X would void any support requests. All of your points stand,  
but I just think that your 'semantics' are a bit harder than the  
reality. :)

Opinions, and semantics. The message is the same, I think.

>> and the 'progressive' profile (a free-for-all overwrite-whatever- 
>> you-want policy).
>
> the progressive profile is anything but a 'free-for-all'. Its  
> primary purpose is setting up the environment required to build the  
> Darwin OS. Nothing that gets installed in a default configuration  
> will break OS X. I use what are arguably the most demanding apps  
> available for OS X(shake, Logic Pro, Final Cut Pro, etc.), and have  
> been for almost a year now without any ill side effects from using  
> the progressive profile.

I didn't mean free-for-all in a negative way. What I meant is that,  
by policy, there's nothing that the progressive profile must avoid  
overwriting. If this policy needs to be updated, let me know. I'm  
going to be writing up all the 'policy' that I know about so that we  
can make this sort of thing public. Will post to this list later with  
updates, hopefully.

>> In the future we will support installing everything to some  
>> location, for example '/opt/gentoo', to provide the best of both  
>> worlds. In the meanwhile, the default (collision-protect) profile  
>> sounds like what you're after; Apple-provided files are not  
>> allowed to be overwritten when this profile is in use (there is a  
>> bug open on symlinks being overwritten, but that is being taken  
>> care of and is a fairly isolated situation).
>
> I think Fink and/or DarwinPorts are more what hes after ;)

Blasphemer! ;)

You're probably right, though. It should be made clear at this point  
that portage is _not_ a drop-in replacement for DarwinPorts or Fink.  
I don't think this point is stressed enough, and many new users are  
confused when they find this. I'm not sure exactly why they get this  
impression to begin with, but hey I'm just a silly dev.

--

Hasan Khalil
eBuild and Porting Co-Lead
Gentoo for Mac OS X

Attachment:
PGP.sig (This is a digitally signed message part)
Replies:
Re: Current status
-- Kito
References:
Current status
-- Philipp Riegger
Re: Current status
-- Hasan Khalil
Re: Current status
-- Philipp Riegger
Re: Current status
-- Hasan Khalil
Re: Current status
-- Kito
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-osx: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Current status
Next by thread:
Re: Current status
Previous by date:
Re: Current status
Next by date:
Re: Current status


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-osx mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.