1 |
Grobian- |
2 |
|
3 |
We have a bunch of prefixed ebuilds that we would like to contribute. |
4 |
I'm not sure why the opposition to "experimental", but if it needs to |
5 |
be hosted externally, then I'm in favor of that. .. |
6 |
|
7 |
BTW, where is Kito? (Long time no hear...) |
8 |
|
9 |
-matt |
10 |
|
11 |
On 6/13/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
12 |
> With the current climate within Gentoo regarding anything "experimental" |
13 |
> hosted on official Gentoo hardware or whatever, it may not be the best |
14 |
> any more to have our work on Gentoo resources. Especially with our |
15 |
> requirements of letting outsiders contribute, it seems to be more and |
16 |
> more unpleasant that our tree is currently hosted in Gentoo SVN. |
17 |
> In order to change this, I think we have two options: either self |
18 |
> hosting, or letting it host by someone else, like SourceForge. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I have a preference for letting our tree being hosted by SourceForge |
21 |
> using SVN. We can make a SVN snapshot and put it there, then add |
22 |
> whoever we want to have contributing there. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The only drawback of such move would be that we decouple from Gentoo, |
25 |
> which might be politically not such a good move. However, I think I |
26 |
> don't care. I would be happy if finally people could work on it. Any |
27 |
> input on this? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> Fabian Groffen |
31 |
> Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |