Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Finn Thain <fthain@××××××××××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] On keywording ppc-macos
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 04:14:00
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.63.0508241345070.19144@loopy.telegraphics.com.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] On keywording ppc-macos by Kito
1 On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Kito wrote:
2
3 >
4 > On Aug 23, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Grobian wrote:
5 >
6 > On a somewhat related note, we need to decide sooner than later on how
7 > distinguish between the collision-protect and non-collision-protected
8 > profiles in ebuilds, as some things that are getting in the tree break
9 > with a proper gentoo environment, mostly auto{conf,make} issues at the
10 > moment (-a -c -f stuff, etc) , as well as python issues creeping up as
11 > well, but this will probably get more convoluted very shortly...
12
13 Convoluted? That would be my cue :-p
14
15 I'll assume that the darwin profile has prefix /, with no special PATH,
16 while the "portage for os x/second class citizen" profile gets prefix
17 (say) /opt/gentoo, and PATH prepended with /opt/gentoo/bin:/opt/gentoo/...
18 [1].
19
20 Now, if an ebuild needs to know that it has "2nd class" status, wouldn't a
21 use flag be appropriate? And if you were to implement such a use flag,
22 could it not be useful to other second-class citizens? For example, in
23 "portage for non-Gentoo Linux" or "portage for solaris" profiles.
24
25 -f
26
27 [1] On reflection, I agree with grobian. I don't think it makes sense to
28 try and support an appended PATH (though it may be useful for some as an
29 unsupported option.)
30
31 > --Kito
32 >
33 > >
34 > >--
35 > >Fabian Groffen
36 > >eBuild && Porting
37 > >Gentoo for Mac OS X
38 > >--
39 > >gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list
40 > >
41 >
42 >
43 --
44 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] On keywording ppc-macos Finn Thain <fthain@××××××××××××××××.au>