1 |
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Kito wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Grobian wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On a somewhat related note, we need to decide sooner than later on how |
7 |
> distinguish between the collision-protect and non-collision-protected |
8 |
> profiles in ebuilds, as some things that are getting in the tree break |
9 |
> with a proper gentoo environment, mostly auto{conf,make} issues at the |
10 |
> moment (-a -c -f stuff, etc) , as well as python issues creeping up as |
11 |
> well, but this will probably get more convoluted very shortly... |
12 |
|
13 |
Convoluted? That would be my cue :-p |
14 |
|
15 |
I'll assume that the darwin profile has prefix /, with no special PATH, |
16 |
while the "portage for os x/second class citizen" profile gets prefix |
17 |
(say) /opt/gentoo, and PATH prepended with /opt/gentoo/bin:/opt/gentoo/... |
18 |
[1]. |
19 |
|
20 |
Now, if an ebuild needs to know that it has "2nd class" status, wouldn't a |
21 |
use flag be appropriate? And if you were to implement such a use flag, |
22 |
could it not be useful to other second-class citizens? For example, in |
23 |
"portage for non-Gentoo Linux" or "portage for solaris" profiles. |
24 |
|
25 |
-f |
26 |
|
27 |
[1] On reflection, I agree with grobian. I don't think it makes sense to |
28 |
try and support an appended PATH (though it may be useful for some as an |
29 |
unsupported option.) |
30 |
|
31 |
> --Kito |
32 |
> |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> >-- |
35 |
> >Fabian Groffen |
36 |
> >eBuild && Porting |
37 |
> >Gentoo for Mac OS X |
38 |
> >-- |
39 |
> >gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |