On Aug 7, 2005, at 07:41, Grobian wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I got repoman telling me I didn't have any Java installed on my OSX
> system. I took a look into the macos/virtuals file and macos/10.4/
> package.provided file and figured there seems to be an inconsistency.
>
> package provided says:
>
> dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08
>
> while virtuals says:
>
> virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk
>
> To 'fix' this issue, I altered virtuals like this:
>
> --- default-darwin/macos/virtuals 6 Aug 2005 22:43:40
> -0000 1.7
> +++ default-darwin/macos/virtuals 7 Aug 2005 12:35:48 -0000
> @@ -12,5 +12,6 @@
> virtual/xft x11-base/apple-xfree
> virtual/opengl x11-base/apple-xfree
> virtual/blackbox x11-wm/fluxbox
> -virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk
> +virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk
> virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin
>
> note that the virual/jre seems to be fine and in line with
> package.provided.
>
> are there any objections to this change? should it be the other
> way around (the edit in package.provided)? ... or can I just check
> it in?
Kito and I discussed this yesterday, and he committed the fix about
15 hours ago, or somewhere thereabouts. From what I can see in CVS,
the problem is fixed. He essentially did what you did, but in an
effect of what he felt is more correct. Since I'm no expert on how
the java herd divides up the packages, I left him to do his thing. To
save you the trouble, here's the important stuff:
> macos $ grep -R java .
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08
> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.08
> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.08
> ./virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk
> ./virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5
> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.04
> ./progressive/virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk
It's a good thing that you posted this, though. It provides a good
follow-up, and opens the floor for discussion on said changes. So,
people -- discuss, if you so desire! As always, we, the Gentoo for
Mac OS X team, are open to comments, suggestions, free food, and
patches.
--
Hasan Khalil
eBuild and Porting Co-Lead
Gentoo for Mac OS X
|