Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] New document: Project targets
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:01:20
Message-Id: 20051212180017.GJ14948@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] New document: Project targets by Nathan
1 On 12-12-2005 09:36:52 -0700, Nathan wrote:
2 > > Anywayz, I wrote a new page yesterday:
3 > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/macos/targets.xml
4 >
5 > Sooo, after reading your new page I don't understand your comment
6 > about not being a prefixed project, unless you are talking about your
7 > defined distinction between "Gentoo for Mac OS X" and "Gentoo Portage
8 > for Mac OS X."
9
10 We are *not* prefixed. This a page on what we would *like* to be,
11 somehow.
12
13 > ^-- Whatever you call it, it appears you've officially chosen to focus
14 > on the prefixed path. Good news to me, as a working prefixed system
15 > is what I've been waiting for for over a year now. (Last December
16 > pvdabeel was saying he working on a prototype that should be usable in
17 > January....then February, then maybe March, then he disappeared.)
18
19 Yes, we focus on having a prefixed install. And to avoid any
20 confusion, or make it even worse hereafter, in *development* we have
21 *extremely* buggy beta versions of a prefixed install, which are *no way
22 of even being close to ready for users*. Please note, a huge disclaimer
23 applies here: it's *NOT* useable at all. What's currently in gentoo,
24 and in installers, is *not* a prefixed version.
25
26 > I appreciate the labels+definitions for the alternatives. That makes
27 > it loads easier to refer to things and have some reasonable hope that
28 > others will understand what you're referring to.
29
30 I realise that this page might be a bit vague. In the first place it is
31 meant for developers active in this field, and interested users.
32
33 > > The page should fill a gap in the explanation of our road ahead, and my
34 > Actually, the page quite admirably explained the past, the
35 > alternatives, and why the present focus is (rightly) turning towards
36 > prefixed efforts. The future ("road ahead") wasn't really explicitly
37
38 I realised that when I re-read it. I'll try to improve it anyway.
39
40 > mentioned. I'd welcome a tentative future timeline at the bottom of
41 > the doc, if possible. The common question outside of the core dev
42 > team seems to be "When will there be something that works that I can
43 > use [and/or contribute to]?"
44
45 This is actually a question, which's answer is much larger than just me
46 or the team members. It requires the whole community to agree on a
47 rather large change into their core product: Portage. You can consider
48 this as a road towards a huge GLEP. Pieces that I write might be
49 reusable, in such document, to make it a full story, including some
50 experimental, but mature results. It's not only our work, far from.
51 Without the help of some Portage guys, we'd never got here I think.
52
53 Since we're all busy, and progress usually comes with little bumps, I'm
54 hestitant to give any predictions on time frames. I don't oversee the
55 whole picture yet, so I don't want to give any release dates.
56
57 Thanks for your time to read it and comment upon.
58
59
60 --
61 Fabian Groffen
62 Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
63 --
64 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] New document: Project targets Nathan <nathan.stocks@×××××.com>