| 1 |
On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Should be usable in both cases. Literally, the prefix stable patch is |
| 6 |
> chunks of my 2.1 work and haubi's work torn out and integrated into |
| 7 |
> 2.0 |
| 8 |
> for prototype demonstration. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Those last 2 words should be stressed... don't want anyone getting |
| 11 |
false ideas of whats being done here... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Exempting the AFFIX difference, should |
| 14 |
> work in a similar fashion across systems, although haubi's stage0 work |
| 15 |
> is a seperate thing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yeah, I'm pretty much finished with the base-system packages, so a |
| 18 |
traditional prefixed stage{1,3} can take the place of haubis stage0/ |
| 19 |
toolsbox stuff. Of course you still need to bootstrap manually if you |
| 20 |
want a different default prefix than whatever the stage builders |
| 21 |
used. For Darwin/OS X, I'm leaning towards using /Library/Portage as |
| 22 |
the default prefix, not sure about what would be preferable for other |
| 23 |
systems. /opt might be a good choice, but for reasons I can't really |
| 24 |
clarify yet, a unique namespace seems better suited...but I digress. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
--Kito |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives