| 1 |
On 26-01-2006 12:28:02 -0500, Nick Dimiduk wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>started putting together a .pkg (for my own uses) based on the most recent |
| 3 |
> >>portage-2.1 ebuild and it occurred to me that this may not be appropriate. |
| 4 |
> >>I'd be happy to clean it up for general distribution. |
| 5 |
> >Does 2.1 work properly on OSX? I have problems with 2.0.53 and up... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Should I use the latest 2.0.52? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Just "upgrade" to the latest from the installer (mind the |
| 10 |
collision-protect issue...): 2.0.51.22-r3 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> My intention is to build a clean chroot for the reliable testing of |
| 13 |
> packages for keywording. I don't mind doing so for the prefix version |
| 14 |
> of portage; my understanding is that it's not quite ready yet. I'd |
| 15 |
> like to work on keywording in the mean time. I'll try to contact kito |
| 16 |
> directly for more details. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Good. Very good. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 22 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives