| 1 |
Finn Thain wrote: |
| 2 |
>> To me, this package just works on both Panther and Tiger, but it could |
| 3 |
>> have been that it wouldn't on one of them. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> If "wouldn't work" means "wouldn't build", isn't it a package.mask |
| 6 |
> problem, as Hasan said? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes, Hasan's solution is what I would have chosen if it wouldn't build. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Generally speaking I wouldn't be suprised to need emerge --emptytree world |
| 11 |
> if I wanted to take my gentoo installation to a darwin 9 system. I don't |
| 12 |
> think that using more portage provided builds is going to change that. |
| 13 |
> Indeed, if portage provides the entire userland, it can't be expected to |
| 14 |
> work at all under a new kernel. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yeah, and I think we shouldn't even try to support that. Though I hope |
| 17 |
that if the major version of the kernel is equal that the userland keeps |
| 18 |
on spinning. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Which makes me think that the ppc-macos/10.3 profile should actually |
| 21 |
> inherit from a ppc-darwin/8 profile (in my fantasy ;-) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Why ppc-darwin/8 and not ppc-darwin/7? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives