1 |
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 12:23 -0500, Nick Dimiduk wrote: |
2 |
> Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > when talking to a colleague of mine (he's using Gentoo-Linux, and wants |
6 |
> > to use prefixed portage), an idea for the prefix-api came up: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> <snip> (no room to comment at this time) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Another possible feature in the future (not finished thinking about yet) |
11 |
> > could be to have portage install each (non-system-)package into a |
12 |
> > separate prefix within its domain, without need to change prefix-api. |
13 |
> > This could help ebuild-devs to detect unknown dependencies, which are |
14 |
> > not found implicitly if not specified at configure-line. |
15 |
> > Well - only for a testing system, and to be enabled explicitly |
16 |
> > by setting FEATURES. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> This sounds a bit like the intentions of DragonflyBSD. Am I |
19 |
> miss-understanding you? |
20 |
|
21 |
Huh - what is DragonflyBSD, never heard before. |
22 |
|
23 |
Found dragonflybsd.org... |
24 |
|
25 |
Well - have read the Goals->packages there, seems that they are after |
26 |
some similar goals/address similar problems. Do you mean that ? |
27 |
|
28 |
-haubi |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |